Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 07:17:53 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <42940A81.1030801@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de> <20050524202647.GA28322@xor.obsecurity.org> <4293A18F.6080200@incubus.de> <20050524221454.GA56421@xor.obsecurity.org> <4293F4D9.90204@incubus.de> <84dead7205052420503fded0e9@mail.gmail.com> <4293FD27.90500@incubus.de> <20050525042706.GA60021@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294054C.9080207@incubus.de> <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: >>I've now disabled the sound chip in the BIOS, no change. > But is the driver still attaching? No, and I now have disabled loading the module at boot aswell. Still no difference. I would also think that if that were the cause, the situation would be a lot worse on the notebook, where a lot more devices share one interrupt. But on the notebook (much slower machine), it isn't quite as bad as on the desktop machine. mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42940A81.1030801>