Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:49:38 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: FBSD Doc project <doc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: authors.ent and developers.ent ? Message-ID: <20121104174938.GD1343@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <5096A354.9070701@freebsd.org> References: <5095AF77.2070908@freebsd.org> <20121104165934.GB1343@glenbarber.us> <5096A354.9070701@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 06:18:12PM +0100, René Ladan wrote: > On 04-11-2012 17:59, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:57:43AM +0100, René Ladan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> author entities are defined both in authors.ent (with email address) and > >> developers.ent (without email address). The latter is used in e.g. > >> htdocs/administration.xml, resulting in cumbersome lines like > >> > >> <li>&a.name; <<a > >> href="mailto:name@FreeBSD.org">name@FreeBSD.org</a>></li> > >> > >> where just > >> > >> <li>&a.name;</li> would be clearer. > >> > >> So would there be some way to merge these two files (both docbook-wise > >> and content-wise) to avoid having to maintain two files and avoiding > >> cumbersome lines? > >> > > I'm a bit baffled by this, to be honest. > Oops.. To clarify, I mean I am baffled by having two files that have very similar purposes, not your email. :-) > > Perhaps we can merge these files together, and have each developer > > entity consist of two lines, one for name only, one for name + email? > > > > Something like this, maybe? > > > > <!ENTITY a.gjb.name "Glen Barber"> > > <!ENTITY a.gjb.email "&a.gjb.name <email>gjb@FreeBSD.org</email>"> > > > > This would allow us to keep the current multi-format entries, and > > consolidate them into one file. > > > > Thoughts? > That would be a start. What about an defining a third entity (not sure > about the name...) > > <!ENTITY a.rene.hrefmail "&a.rene.name; <<a > href=mailto:rene@FreeBSD.org">rene@FreeBSD.org</a>>"> > Would this be necessary? I think this is handled automatically by the <email> tag we already use. Glen [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQlqqyAAoJEFJPDDeguUaj3HkH/0lee/T0ouEHvX/zfVtkC/fY AL4I4TaO0j/jJ5sk4SXsAULlPENVPAZ4Fvk6voQKTJbzYap1tbbF+WkB6ZIMh2fi j3Du9992Qhs+aaAZASQnTn3WeMbkHl6tfx0lLMQAPLuA2A79/W58+OdC1XrU/fDG I4n+yQmWw5FFzD372pHLpejvORj0BBdrUL1iv7PJJ7zB28XxPu9GJrBWzk75VdsA UBHMqaZItCrvp5qHEVBu1owKU9cgdgvVZE33zRJdehoMZW1Rn/OjxVA5fmMJ9Vgn eJhK3E7qlnNDcBPcrWAg/A37hC57Kmotxb1nxhi9HAQxE7b0Z0YmxJ8grYdsV78= =cY4E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121104174938.GD1343>