Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Apr 2000 12:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        J McKitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bad memory patch?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004061225430.75475-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000406163815.A29984@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, J McKitrick wrote:

> I saw this link recently...
> 
> http://home.zonnet.nl/vanrein/badram/
> 
> Apparently, you make a floppy with the supplied image, boot with it to
> find the bad RAM addresses, and then those addresses are passed on as a
> kernel parameter once the patch is applied.  Bad addresses will be excluded
> from addressable/virtual memory from then on.
> 
> Sounds like sometheing we could use, eh?

It's not possible to find bad RAM deterministically from software..if you
have bad RAM, you need to replace it, end of story.

Kris

----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004061225430.75475-100000>