Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 13:22:03 -0500 From: Edwin Culp <eculp@mexcom.net> To: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> Cc: "Riley J. McIntire" <rileyj@tgci.com>, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Moving server to different ethernet can I use the same IP #s? Message-ID: <340DAACB.6D2EF3C0@mexcom.net> References: <Pine.UW2.3.95.970903095654.9174B-100000@cedb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Busarow wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Riley J. McIntire wrote: > > What I've tried so far is bind an ip # from the new net to the > > interface. I can telnet to this ip number from the new network. > > The default gateway is now 205.185.169.1 (a cisco 2500) > > Do I need to add a route from the cisco to the old numbers? How? > > Speaking of which, the numbers are 206.250.85.99 to x.x.x.109. > > On the cisco > > ip route 206.250.85.96 255.255.255.240 205.185.169.120 > > That is for a /28 subnet with usable addresses from 97-110, > probably what you have. > > > ifconfig_ed1="inet 205.185.169.120 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > > > router_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable a routing daemon. > > This will probably cause you fits. Turn off routed. > > > /sbin/ifconfig ed1 alias 206.250.85.99 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > > This one is fine. > > > /sbin/ifconfig ed1 alias 206.250.85.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > > This one, and the others that follow, need a netmask of 255.255.255.255 > > > /sbin/route add -net 205.185.169.0 -interface 205.185.169.120 -netmask > > Get rid of this. > > Dan > -- > Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 > DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com > Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 I would still go to http://www.boardwatch.com/isp/trace.htm or somewhere similar to see if the world knows where my little sub-net is :-)) From what I'm seeing, I have my, hopefully unfounded, doubts. Provecho, Ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?340DAACB.6D2EF3C0>