Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 17:45:42 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/dlmalloc Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/devel/dlmalloc/files Makefile README.FreeBSD Message-ID: <22779.986485542@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2001 18:39:23 %2B0300." <3ACC91AB.2A183123@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3ACC91AB.2A183123@FreeBSD.org>, Maxim Sobolev writes: >> > Moreover, due to not very clear for me reasons Python benchmark (pybench) >> > is about 60% (!!!) faster with this allocator comparing to the libc one. >> > Obviously we should investigate this further and if there is no error >> > then tune either Python or our own malloc. >> >> Did you measure this with the right malloc flags for the libc version ? >> >> Remember that -current runs with malloc flags "AJ" as default, that is not >> fair if it comes to performance comparisons (but it does wonders for finding >> bugs :-) > >I don't use default value: > >$ ls -l /etc/malloc.conf >lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Jul 22 2000 /etc/malloc.conf@ -> HRajuxz I think you should use 'r' for performance comparisons... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22779.986485542>