Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 13:21:45 -0500 From: chuck@fang.cs.sunyit.edu To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any interest in Quickcam Driver Message-ID: <199601311821.NAA19322@fang.cs.sunyit.edu> In-Reply-To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> "Re: Any interest in Quickcam Driver" (Jan 31, 10:17am)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 31, 10:17am, Paul Traina wrote:
} Subject: Re: Any interest in Quickcam Driver
}
} From: chuck@fang.cs.sunyit.edu
} Subject: Re: Any interest in Quickcam Driver
} On Jan 30, 11:31pm, Paul Traina wrote:
}
} Not to belittle the effort that Paul LaFollette went to to do his port,
} I think it would be more benifitial to wait and use the driver Paul Traina
} is working on. This way any and all work on Quickcam applications can be
} cross developed on FreeBSD and Linux.
}
} No, that's silly... we should really just grab the best _technical_ driver
} from all camps and insure that we all conform to the same driver API. I have
} no idea how compatible mine is with the next-generation Linux driver that is
} in the works...hell, I didn't even know there _was_ a next generation linux
} driver API in the works until 5 minutes ago.
}
} Don't worry, by the time all of us get our code out the door, I'm sure there
} will be a TON of cross-polination.
}-- End of excerpt from Paul Traina
Agreed! That is actually what I was refering to. I was trying to
say that we aught to wait and not just slap in the first driver that comes
along.
--
Charles Green, PRC Inc. UN*X System Administration
22 Powell Ave. Apt. B UN*X Security &
Whitesboro, NY 13492 Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601311821.NAA19322>