Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:34:50 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r284198 - head/bin/ls Message-ID: <20150615173450.GA76624@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVepxzppsqee36umXgG1eiw_hjcWkjQFmyst80NYwrE0Tw@mail.gmail.com> References: <860017ED-D754-450C-865D-2D81A30C2212@xcllnt.net> <CAG=rPVd93Q18aYnSGSf_QH4C08RCq5wsdKQSNYTgWQ2huTbUHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150614100045.GF58397@zxy.spb.ru> <557D55CB.5050009@fastmail.net> <20150614171031.GA5857@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <557DCBED.2010804@fastmail.net> <CAJ-VmoktZTMnva02rTojZeGcd3q5BJ9RHGUHgFA=Ghn=WOxQyw@mail.gmail.com> <39A1D5A9-1BD9-4828-B10D-D347771CBAD2@bsdimp.com> <20150615171208.GW1647@zxy.spb.ru> <CAG=rPVepxzppsqee36umXgG1eiw_hjcWkjQFmyst80NYwrE0Tw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Having more tools use libxo will definitely make it easier to write tools
> like Eagleeye.
>
Having more tools use libxo means having more broken tools.
% w --libxo
w: missing libxo option
OK. Let's check the manpage.
% man w
SYNOPSIS
w [--libxo] [-dhin] [-M core] [-N system] [user ...]
--libxo doesn't take an optarg. The only other use of
libxo in w(1) is the libxo(3) cross-reference.
% man 3 libxo
(search on --libxo)
Output can then be generated in various style, using the "--libxo"
option.
The only appearance of --libxo is in the above sentence. Great.
So, what are these fictitious optargs and why are they not
documented?
--
Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150615173450.GA76624>