Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:53:10 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, developers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! MFC's Message-ID: <20001027185310.V5433@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <20001027094613.E28123@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:46:13AM -0700 References: <20001027184107.T5433@lucifer.bart.nl> <20001027094613.E28123@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20001027 18:50], Alfred Perlstein (bright@wintelcom.net) wrote: >* Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> [001027 09:41] wrote: >> Short: if you value stability, please be careful updating any mission >> critical system for the coming few days. > >If you consider anything as a possible regression for stable users >then I urge you to not even consider MFC'ing. > >-stable is not meant to be a snapshot of -current, it's supposed >to be _stable_ as the name implies. You totally miss the point I was trying to communicate across. While I strive to make sure everything I MFC is tested it can always happen that something for some reason blows up. Some things are just beyond your control. I am just giving people a warning to be careful the next few days in updating their system as I am sure the MFC rushing of some things might occur again. Please don't tutor me on what STABLE should be, I think I know it myself as well as you do. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl I believe because it is impossible... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001027185310.V5433>