Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:01:52 -0800 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r260888 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf Message-ID: <65D0418F-A3F2-490E-8A7E-E2212BB7F2F8@felyko.com> In-Reply-To: <201401191846.s0JIkdvw046339@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201401191846.s0JIkdvw046339@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Jan 2014, at 10:46, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: emaste > Date: Sun Jan 19 18:46:38 2014 > New Revision: 260888 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/260888 >=20 > Log: > Add VT kernel configuration to ease testing of vt(9), aka Newcons I thought there was consensus that adding these amd64/i386 configuration = files to the repository was not good idea. =20 Is this something that helps a lot of people? Are you thinking of = removing it later? Can't they co-exist based on a tunable? -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65D0418F-A3F2-490E-8A7E-E2212BB7F2F8>