Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:32:40 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings Message-ID: <1377027160.1478.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB29@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1376348029.1469.49.camel@localhost> <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB29@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:20 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: > We have seen at least one video vendor that uses a Buffer object > instead of the ACPI-required package object as the 4th _DSM argument. > > The T520 has a Nvidia thingy in it. Is this something we need to deal with in the BSD ACPI implementation or is this a vendor thing? Sean [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSE8RYAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaHfekH+wau6yS3P/djFhqQPl3oJVEx A9/cyl9ZrB+zrSZPIY4Q37J4usVQJMFrjhcbfodBIei25+NY0s2z1+8K89y77xqj D6U1ELTB1rrLx58lobwWGOpw0FxeUx7tZrtzHxsqYj6d/iMabrdc5oqTByNrUw8p rhO7okh8QQJsx6O2aLNfismHptYFjLshbTvQbgIxJAZOOzYG20ZwlN1rvljv7UjY vH6ZjvBo7VNEx4HxFScmj2OwAvaQYL67E35Dhy58PXEK5JxIsVUjkr84gcDpOHC9 Pf7gymc8wj7cU2BESSIll2+7gPN4994XZoqggcdT/CgOJnqXQX8eVjfa4ONvL60= =6bma -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1377027160.1478.5.camel>