Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:23:58 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.licenses.db.mk bsd.licenses.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <4BFC863E.7000001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimnACR60whgHPo-005k-F0lr8bvFei2VqafCHOd@mail.gmail.com> References: <201005250025.o4P0P2Fj033764@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100525093915.03cfacfa@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <AANLkTimnACR60whgHPo-005k-F0lr8bvFei2VqafCHOd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/25/2010 4:06 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Thanks as well Alejandro for the hard work. > > Just out of curiosity, was any exploration done with existing work in > the NetBSD side as far as existing licenses or naming schemes are > concerned? I ask because if it seems logical, I would go with some of > the names that they've established, because they're down to a fairly > good level of granularity (even between the different BSDL versions). > No, but it's a good idea. I'll check it out before importing licenses. Regards, Ale
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BFC863E.7000001>