Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 12:35:22 -0800 From: "Maxim Hermion" <muxhermion@fastmail.fm> To: "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>, "Munden, Randall J" <Randall.Munden@umb.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? Message-ID: <20040105203522.5523043D14@server1.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <001f01c3d3c3$11ad2830$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> References: <79B4EAB03B5E4649A740A8C1452F60643523EE@y6001a.umb.corp.umb.com> <001f01c3d3c3$11ad2830$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:35:25 -0500, "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> said: > Maybe we should all start using and developing for Dillon's DragonFlyBSD > -- > it's already got a whole bunch of new features on the 4-x base that will > soon rival the functionality of 5-CURRENT, without the mess. All this > with > a handful of active developers and no bikeshedding. Exactly, if you check the DragonFlyBSD lists you'll see zero flames and bikeseds. And it shows that Matt can indeed be a team player. Not only people like Mark Murray and Greg made an ass of themselves, but it's been now proven by DragonFly's LWTK that heavily mutexed kernels (like FreeBSD's) can never work unless you have an army of coders (like Sun did). Mux -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105203522.5523043D14>