Date: 20 Oct 2001 23:48:40 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Arun Sharma <arun@sharma-home.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: truss vs ktrace Message-ID: <xzpwv1qkmo7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20011020182451.EC4E95E594@sharmas.dhs.org> References: <3BCCCF74.75B7F36C@disney.com> <xzpofn7vxbg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20011020182451.EC4E95E594@sharmas.dhs.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Arun Sharma <arun@sharma-home.net> writes: > Another advantage of truss is that the output is "online" and interactive. > ktrace requires you to use kdump to view the trace. I certainly wouldn't call truss "interactive". As for "online", see the -l command-line option to kdump. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpwv1qkmo7.fsf>