Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:16:51 -0700
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r317547 - head/sys/net
Message-ID:  <20170429021651.GZ56922@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201704281100.v3SB0wgY005696@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201704281100.v3SB0wgY005696@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:00:58AM +0000, Alexander Motin wrote:
A> Author: mav
A> Date: Fri Apr 28 11:00:58 2017
A> New Revision: 317547
A> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317547
A> 
A> Log:
A>   Allow some control over enabled capabilities for if_vlan.
A>   
A>   It improves interoperability with if_bridge, which may need to disable
A>   some capabilities not supported by other members.  IMHO there is still
A>   open question about LRO capability, which may need to be disabled on
A>   physical interface.
A>   
A>   MFC after:	2 weeks
A>   Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.

On quick glance this looks like the opposite to what was done in r281885.

As discussed back 2 years ago:

- There are no NICs that are able to have different set of capabilities
turned on on different VLANs, and unlikely such will appear.
- Capabilities should be switched on VLAN trunk.
- Allowing to switch capabilities on a VLAN with magical flip of properties
  of all the VLANs on the same trunk is an ugly design. This is something
  unexpected for a sysadmin. Better refuse that and make him toggle properties
  on the trunk explicitily.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170429021651.GZ56922>