Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 17:00:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200236] [maintainer][patch] games/wesnoth: fix for some FreeBSD 10.1 builds Message-ID: <bug-200236-25061-oibaqdjBXR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-200236-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-200236-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 --- Comment #24 from Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #20) You just forget about all combinations of CC=/CXX=, compilers from base system and ports and updates of these, current and stable branches, "ports compiler" we had in plans afaik, freebsd and dragonfly differences etc. Compiler version is always objective. Release versions have nothing to do with this at all. > That was unnecessarily complex for academic releases. Let's be practical. Being practical, OPSYS/OSVERSION checks are _always_ more complex and less correct than compiler check. > I do not believe this is not a boost issue. It really is a boost issue, see comment #1. You won't catch this with poudriere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-200236-25061-oibaqdjBXR>