Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:43:51 -0500
From:      George Mitchell <george@m5p.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO
Message-ID:  <50967F27.80909@m5p.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121103190930.GA23145@icarus.home.lan>
References:  <20121103190930.GA23145@icarus.home.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/03/12 15:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> (Please keep me CC'd, as I'm not subscribed to -stable)
>
> I've CC'd Nathan Whitehorn, who according to bsdinstall(8) is the
> author (not sure if maintainer) of the code.
>
> This default has already begun to bite users/SAs in the ass:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-November/246069.html
>
> SU+J (the journalling part specifically) needs to be disabled by default
> in the installer.  This default was a very bad choice and should not
> have been done.  It either indicates someone was out of touch with the
> rest of the issues surrounding the feature, or that someone
> intentionally decided "it's the best way to get people using it for
> testing" (I have seen this justification presented in the past, and it
> is the wrong approach).
>
> However, since some people DO want it (and those folks don't use dump),
> the installer should be modified to make SU+J support toggleable via a a
> checkbox.  The default, obviously, should be unchecked.
>
> If the user checks the checkbox, an ominous warning message should be
> displayed informing the user of the repercussions.  The only option at
> that point should be "OK", after which the checkbox is checked.
>
> Do not tell me "send patches".  This issue/problem has gone on long
> enough, and the community bitched hard/long enough, that the person who
> committed this default should be responsible for fixing it.
>
> We should operate under the assumption that this bug/problem will never
> be fixed.  It probably will be, but again, we must operate with the
> assumption that Kirk et al will require years to fix it.  (It has
> already been something like 9 months.  Or is it a year?)
>
> [...]

I will give this comment a BIG, BIG, +1!                   --  George




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50967F27.80909>