Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:05:13 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160311140513.GQ70809@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <56E2CEF9.3080200@quip.cz> References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <20160308124016.GA70809@zxy.spb.ru> <20160308131847.GP1531@FreeBSD.org> <20160308151459.GB70809@zxy.spb.ru> <05A039B7-AA9A-47BB-B68E-89D9D5627D20@FreeBSD.org> <20160311120511.GN31877@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20160311131055.GO70809@zxy.spb.ru> <20160311132059.GA11339@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20160311133157.GP70809@zxy.spb.ru> <56E2CEF9.3080200@quip.cz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 14:31: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > [...] > > >>> Case of only a few monolitic packages is essentiality simple then case > >>> of 1000 combined packages. > >> pkg info -a on one diff with pkg info -a on the other > >> for the full content: pkg info -a --raw on both end and diff them. > >> > >> That should cover your case, no? > > > > No, that may cause a much false positive: slight different versions, > > unimportant packets and etc. In 1000 packets this give to many noise. > > If you don't need version numbers, you can list just package names > pkg query %n > or package origins > pkg query %o currently: [...] base base base base base base base base base base base base base base base base base base base [...] > Anything else is on your side and even if I understand your complaints > (and I agree with some of them) I don't thing it will change anything on > the future of packaged base. > So it is better to spend our time on working local solution to new > problem. It has some pros and some cons and I hope the pros will > outweigh cons. I am don't talk 'this is imposible'. I am talk 'this is awkward'. What purpose for paclaging base system? packaging for packaging? Or packaging for simplify and comfortably management, maintance and upgrade?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160311140513.GQ70809>