Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:55:33 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Panic on mount with write-locked USB media (umass) 
Message-ID:  <7840.1112784933@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:45:33 %2B0200." <200504060845.j368jXiU001289@peedub.jennejohn.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200504060845.j368jXiU001289@peedub.jennejohn.org>, Gary Jennejohn writes:
>Robert Watson writes:
>> I wonder if a useful middle ground is to adopt (1) above except in the 
>> case of perenially read-only file systems (cd9660), in which case (2) is 
>> adopted?
>> 
>
>It sure would be nice if one could mount an ISO-image (vnode-backed md)
>RW.

All it takes is somebody to rewrite cd9660 to be a r/w filesystem :-)

It's not trivial though, because iso 9660 is essentially a sequential
archive with a index up front, so if you change the size of one file
all the ones after it move as well.  I guess as long as you don't
want to make any files longer it would be relatively possible.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7840.1112784933>