Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:55:39 +0100 From: Paul Robinson <paul@akita.co.uk> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network performance tuning. Message-ID: <20010712175539.B93119@jake.akitanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107111904220.60496-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:37:41PM -0700 References: <20010711195021.A89324@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107111904220.60496-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 12, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote:
> AND we still don't have a working standard SACK implementation.
When I asked about SACK about 18 months ago (IIRC), the general consensus
was that it was a pile of crap, and that FBSD SHOULDN'T implement it if
possible. I however, agree that there are a lot of things in SACK that would
massively benefit FBSD's net performance.
> > of running out of clusters way before MBUF's.)
>
> This CAN be set separatly I think..
I'd like to see where...
--
Paul Robinson ,---------------------------------------
Technical Director @ Akita | A computer lets you make more mistakes
PO Box 604, Manchester, M60 3PR | than any other invention with the
T: +44 (0) 161 228 6388 (F:6389)| possible exceptions of handguns and
| Tequila - Mitch Ratcliffe
`-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010712175539.B93119>