Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:03:32 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: "Don O'Neil" <lists@lizardhill.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Journaling File System - ZFS/??? Message-ID: <20081202190301.H16084@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <B6DC69C36AB645CAB7E1237397B6BC41@mickey> References: <B6DC69C36AB645CAB7E1237397B6BC41@mickey>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's > really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization, no > speed, stability, etc... > > So, my question is this... If you were building a brand new 6.3/7.0 server > with decent performance (dual core, 32 Bit OS - because of known > compatibility issues with specific software, 4 GB RAM, etc...) what file > system would you choose? What options are out there besides UFS and ZFS? i use UFS everywhere. it's ACTUALLY high performance, just lacking ZFS fancy features.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202190301.H16084>