Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:55:07 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c Message-ID: <XFMail.011127165507.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200111280048.fAS0mBb36010@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-Nov-01 Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> ache 2001/11/27 16:48:11 PST
>
> Modified files:
> lib/libc/stdlib strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c strtoul.c
> strtoull.c strtouq.c
> Log:
> Understand national (non-ASCII) digits now
> Allow bases >=36 again
> Misc cleanup
Does this break C89? According to the manpage:
STANDARDS
The strtol() function conforms to ISO/IEC 9899:1990 (``ISO C89''). The
strtoll() function conforms to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (``ISO C99''). The BSD
strtoq() function is deprecated.
and:
ERRORS
[EINVAL] The value of base is not supported or no conversion
could be performed.
Does C99 support more than base 36 and if so should the manpage be updated?
--
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011127165507.jhb>
