Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:23:55 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: =?UTF-8?B?6Z+T5a625qiZIEJpbGwgSGFja2Vy?= <askbill@conducive.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS honesty Message-ID: <18308.51970.859622.363321@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <47818E97.8030601@conducive.net> References: <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> <flr0np$euj$2@ger.gmane.org> <47810DE3.3050106@FreeBSD.org> <flr3iq$of7$1@ger.gmane.org> <478119AB.8050906@FreeBSD.org> <47814160.4050401@samsco.org> <4781541D.6070500@conducive.net> <flrlib$j29$1@ger.gmane.org> <47815D29.2000509@conducive.net> <1199664196.899.10.camel@RabbitsDen> <47818E97.8030601@conducive.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
=?UTF-8?B?6Z+T5a625qiZIEJpbGwgSGFja2Vy?= writes: > > OTOH that's all GPFS is. > > Far more features than that - 'robust', 'fault tolerant', 'Disaster Recovery' > ... all the usual buzzwords. > > And nothing prevents using 'cluster' tools on a single box. Not storage-wise anyway. Having had the misfortune of being involved in a cluster which used GPFS, I can attest that GPFS is anything but "robust" and "fault tolerant" in my experience. Granted this was a few years ago, and things may have improved, but that one horrible experience was sufficient to make me avoid GPFS for life. Drewhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18308.51970.859622.363321>