Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:32:41 +0100 From: Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months Message-ID: <36b8c7d4-df4e-41f5-89ea-eabb5a705204@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <20250127210701.33c15ecc.grembo@freebsd.org> References: <b529fbae8f4f4ed96dab86d11995f4b9@Leidinger.net> <20250127210701.33c15ecc.grembo@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 27.01.2025 o 21:07, Michael Gmelin pisze: > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:58:57 +0100 > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> something has changed in the output of "netstat -rn" between >> 2024-11-23-195545 and 2025-01-22-151306. The default route is not >> listed as "default" anymore, but with "0.0.0.0" resp. "::/0". This >> breaks some tools (e.g. iocage). Iocage uses python, I'm not sure if >> it uses netstat or some other interface, so it may not be directly >> related to netstat itself but could be related to some other stuff >> (netlink maybe?). >> >> Does this ring a bell for someone? >> > If there had been "iocage" in the subject, I would've looked into it > earlier :) > > I'll produce a PR on the repo based on the issue you opened and also > apply it to the port. > > Cheers I was also hit by this change in a couple of ways. When 15.0 is released in future, it's probably worth adding information about the change to the relnotes. -- Marek Zarychta
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36b8c7d4-df4e-41f5-89ea-eabb5a705204>