Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:16:18 -0500 From: "Edwin L. Culp" <eculp@encontacto.net> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Webmail Recommendations Message-ID: <20050407121618.jtbojyx34004ggg8@mail.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0504070957110.57690@elara.frii.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0504070957110.57690@elara.frii.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Matt Ruzicka <matt@frii.com>: > I've seen this has gone back and forth in the past, but I didn't see much > jumping out at me since 2003 in the searchable archives. I'm wondering > what the current temperature of webmail software was. > > We are currently using SquirrelMail and although we are largely quite > happy there are a number of minor oddities that are causing our more > sensitive customers no end of frustration. Seeing as it appears about 25% > of our customers use our webmail at least occasionally we're looking at > potentially shifting gears in the not too distant future. > > What are other using and how happy are they with them? Looks like Horde > and Open WebMail are still running reasonably strong, though I have never > interacted with either of them. Are there new or recently re-emerged > packages out there? > > Unfortunately we are looking for something with a reasonably slick > interface (SquirrelMail is maybe lacking in this department a bit), as > well as a solid backend. As we all know people only care if they notice > the backend causes them problems, but almost everyone seems to care how > something looks. You might want to test drive the latest horde. I can't imagine anything much slicker ;) You will notice a speed difference. SquirrelMail is faster. I use both but prefer horde because of the other apps. and the quality of the framework and integration. ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050407121618.jtbojyx34004ggg8>