Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:49:20 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc rc.shutdown rc.subr src/etc/rc.d localpkg src/sys/sys param.h Message-ID: <20051203034919.GA50289@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <4391061D.3050105@FreeBSD.org> References: <200512022006.jB2K67AK078509@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051203004057.GA20872@nagual.pp.ru> <4390EFB6.3090307@FreeBSD.org> <20051203012324.GA34147@nagual.pp.ru> <4390F9A2.208@FreeBSD.org> <20051203020831.GA34619@nagual.pp.ru> <43910010.2050702@FreeBSD.org> <20051203023304.GA34859@nagual.pp.ru> <4391061D.3050105@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 06:42:37PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > No. The way things stand now, all scripts named foo.sh are sourced into the > main shell, and everything else (base scripts, local scripts, whatever) are > all run in subshells. You could answer this for yourself by looking in > /etc/rc.subr if it's still not clear. Thanx, I understand. There is $rc_fast_and_loose variable (which do just opposite) confuses me first time, but I not found now it is ever set anywhere. What about removing it? > Assuming you're right about that, then you should do something like what I > suggested in the patch I sent so that the script gets installed as apache > instead of apache.sh. Committed. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051203034919.GA50289>