Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:35:09 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files.sparc64 Message-ID: <20040815023509.E31182@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <20040815001834.GJ991@funkthat.com>; from gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu on Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 05:18:34PM -0700 References: <200408150011.i7F0B0lO063891@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040815001834.GJ991@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 05:18:34PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Marius Strobl wrote this message on Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 00:11 +0000: > > marius 2004-08-15 00:11:00 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/conf files.sparc64 > > Log: > > sio(4), which never really worked on sparc64, was removed in favour of > > uart(4) in sparc64/conf/GENERIC revision 1.63 about 9 months ago. Remove > > its source files here, too. > > Hmmm... are you sure? sio worked fine for me on my sparc64 system.. > > I did have troubles when OFW and sio tried to share sio0, but then > I just didn't use sio0.... > > In fact, I've been meaning to commit the sio module framework I have > back when I loaded it to work on my system... > AFAIK, it only really ever worked with tmm's patches at http://people.freebsd.org/~tmm/sio-s64-* but which he stopped updating after uart(4) was commited which was better suited to work on sparc64. Therefor sio(4) was removed from the sparc64 GENERIC kernel and sio_ebus.c deleted. I thought these two sio(4) files in files.sparc64 were just a leftover. Thomas?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040815023509.E31182>