Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:42:29 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: ru@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/arp arp.8 arp.c Message-ID: <200101312142.NAA28274@curve.dellroad.org> In-Reply-To: <200101311752.MAA66835@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> "from Garrett Wollman at Jan 31, 2001 12:52:57 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Wollman writes: > > Hmm.. yeah, it doesn't seem to actually be required for anything.. > > It is. > > If you have a route to destination a.b.c.d, and also publish a proxy > ARP entry to a.b.c.d, and you wish to delete the proxy ARP entry, you > need to specify the proxy bit because otherwise the wrong route will > be deleted. This seems a little funny then.. why then would you ever want not to use "proxy" keyword? That is, why would you expect to be able delete a real route using the arp command? Seems like we should just make the "proxy" keyword implicit all the time. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101312142.NAA28274>