Date: 28 Feb 1999 23:22:35 +0100 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: zone: entry not free Message-ID: <5lemnaxj6c.fsf@mg.trafford.dementia.org> In-Reply-To: Eivind Eklund's message of "Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:16:26 %2B0100" References: <19990223094120.A97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <199902230909.MAA01169@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> <19990223105939.D97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <19990223161625.B10845@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > > That is, INVARIANTS in kernel incompatible with dynamic loading. > > > > Somehow this strikes me as a Bad Thing... > > It _is_ a bad thing. I've been pondering what to do with the > intrusive invariant checks - make them dependent on > INTRUSIVE_INVARIANTS, perhaps? That would still make some KLDs > incompatible with INTRUSIVE_INVARIANTS, but that is probably the best > we can do. I think that the goal should be to make KLDs work with all kinds of kernels. And the only place where this seems to be a problem is with zalloc and zfree. So it seems to me that one of the following could be done to solve it: a. make zalloc and zfree non-inline b. call zalloci and zfreei in code that can end up in KLDs c. call zalloci and zfreei everywhere where it's not performance-critical /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5lemnaxj6c.fsf>