Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:13:33 +0800 From: Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/45755: /usr/ports/net/dictd does not build, at least on 4.7-RELEASE Message-ID: <20021218101333.GA90562@fatpipi.cirx.org> In-Reply-To: <20021218085050.GA23253@trit.org> References: <200212180830.gBI8U4V8042817@freefall.freebsd.org> <20021218085050.GA23253@trit.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:50:50AM +0000, Dima Dorfman wrote: > [cc'd to ports in the hope that someone will make portmgr reply] > > Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org> wrote: > > I think it's impossible to fix dictd on RELENG_4. > > I beg to differ. The attached patch makes it compile on RELENG_4, but Wooha. I admitted that I only took a 3 secs inspectin in wctype.h and made my conclusion. Dictd is your baby, and surely you know how to teach him to behave well ;) > possibly breaks UTF8 dictionaries (I haven't tried). It does not Currently we have 2 dictd-database in ports tree. One is chinese/dictd-database, and another one is net/dictd-database. Both of them are not utf8 dictionaries. For an average ports+dictd* consumer, lacking of utf8 support is not harmful. > affect functionality on 5.0. I've sent this to portmgr three times > (this message is the fourth), but have heard no reply. > > I think breaking a new feature is better than breaking it completely. /me ping portmgr BTW, isn't fixing breakage on RELENG_4 implicitly Ok'ed ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021218101333.GA90562>