Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:06:58 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@FreeBSD.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Repo copy graphics/gimp-devel -> graphics/gimp2? Message-ID: <4065A6A2.60007@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1080399771.19849.16.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <opr5hkpcfm8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <1080399771.19849.16.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: >V pá, 26. 03. 2004 v 21:33, Jeremy Messenger píše: > > > >>Hello, >> >>The graphics/gimp-devel is now in the stable version, so isn't it good >>time to repo copy it to as graphics/gimp2? :-) >> >> > >I'd rather see graphics/gimp, with graphics/gimp1 gone. >I filed a PR for repocopy machinery, see > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?q=64804 > >Comments from other GNOME team members before I turn it over on portmgr? > > > Yep. GIMP1 must be retired. I mailed Joe a couple of days ago. He also agreed. May be we better use graphics/gimp (as it proposed in PR) for stable port version? I doubt any time in the future we will want to have two or more stable versions. All the best, Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4065A6A2.60007>