Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:23:02 -0500 (EST) From: Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> To: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> Cc: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10102091721400.31680-100000@spider.pilosoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102091610090.85718-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Chris Dillon wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dan Nelson wrote: > Cool, if thats all it will take, I'll give it a try. But, whatever > method Compaq/Intel is using doesn't require me to set up the ports on > the switch as being part of a trunk. It "just works". And IIRC, when Its not real trunking. Your incoming traffic will still come on a single link, only outbound traffic will be shared. (Or at least that's how I think compaq stuff will work). > I actually tried to set the ports on the 3COM switch up as trunk > ports, it didn't work right. Maybe 3COM is doing something entirely > different. Prolly. FEC is cisco-specific thingy, like ISL... -alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.10.10102091721400.31680-100000>