Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:34:54 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Subject: Re: [jakub@redhat.com:Linking against libpthread via -pthread? Message-ID: <20060211003454.GA96721@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060210191637.374daa37@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <20060210181715.GA21782@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060210193907.GE2090@dan.emsphone.com> <20060210194503.GA10370@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060210195204.GF2090@dan.emsphone.com> <20060210191637.374daa37@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:16:37PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > In the last episode (Feb 10), Steve Kargl said: > > > > > Some background information: I routinely build GCC mainline on > > > > > i386-*-freebsd and amd64-*-freebsd. GCC mainline is introducing > > > > > OpenMP support. When libgomp.so.1 is built, the compiler is > > > > > given the -pthread option throughout the construction of > > > > > libgomp.so.1. However, a "ldd libgomp.so.1" shows no dependence > > > > > on libpthread.so.2 (context snipped) > No. The change to link in libc by default and libpthread with -pthread > are inthe works and will be committed shortly. There is not way around > this if we want working versioned libc and libpthread in our system. Thanks for the info. I'll relay this to the GCC developers working on libgomp. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060211003454.GA96721>