Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:12:01 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc/javacc Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20031007071201.GA29040@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031007054947.GA47296@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <200310061714.h96HEc9P048438@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031007013626.GA14133@regency.nsu.ru> <20031007054947.GA47296@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:49:47PM -0600, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:36:26AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:14:38AM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > > > glewis 2003/10/06 10:14:38 PDT > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > textproc/javacc Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > > > > Hmm, it seems like `textproc' isn't the best suitable category for a Java > > compiler, is it? > > Its not a Java compiler, its a Java parser generator (think yacc, not cc). Oh, I've misread the pkg-descr, mea culpa. > > However, in essence I agree. It should be in devel along with antlr, > which is its main competition in the Java world, and bison. The purpose While `devel' is probably OK, just out of curiosity, what is wrong with `java' category? :-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031007071201.GA29040>