Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:33:34 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc group master.passwd Message-ID: <20050609230334.GH87456@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <42A8483B.3070001@samsco.org> References: <200506091257.j59CvVNu043268@grovel.grondar.org> <42A8483B.3070001@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 9 June 2005 at 7:46:35 -0600, Scott Long wrote: > Mark Murray wrote: >> "David O'Brien" writes: >> >>>> It's not a FreeBSD convention. If the underscore serves no other >>>> purpose than satisfying an OpenBSD convention, it should go. >>> >>> Agreed. >> >> >> Also agreed. > > Disagreed. It sounds like OPenBSD has a useful convention. Even > though it's not the traditional FreeBSD way, it still has merit. "Agreed" or "disagreed", depending on where you came in. I agree with Scott: OpenBSD has thought this one through better than we have. It looks like a good idea. Why reinvent the wheel and be gratuitously different? Greg -- The virus contained in this message was not detected. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCqMrGIubykFB6QiMRAoAGAJ4v+Ari1R/+ZlIqz+s5Ml76gqZErQCgpLah L0gYlItXkjfz8ReF1fhV9Fs= =KPZ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050609230334.GH87456>