Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:24:52 -0500 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed Message-ID: <20020328032452.GB13004@laptop.lambertfam.org> In-Reply-To: <E16qGyG-000DH2-00@mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk> References: <3CA1F99B.9030009@gmx.net> <E16qGyG-000DH2-00@mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:12:24PM +0000, Pete French wrote: > > I don't mind sendmail being the default, what I do mind is that after > > every upgrade I need to find the new sendmail binary, delete it, and > > point a link towards the qmail sendmail binary. > > Err - mailwrapper ? I hate sendmail too, my /etc/mail/mailer.conf looks > like this: > > sendmail /usr/local/sbin/exim > send-mail /usr/local/sbin/exim > mailq /usr/local/sbin/exim > newaliases /usr/local/sbin/exim Except that with the rc.conf changes to sendmail_enable you now need to start your MTA from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/{qmail|postfix|exim|...}.sh or rc.local and setting sendmail_enable=NO rather than it just working once you fixup mailer.conf. I think this patch pretty much does away with the arguments that the sendmail_* rc.conf variables should be mta_* as it pretty much makes the knob useless for any other mailer with a sendmail compatible interface. I'm not complaining about it. I do like I'm supposed to and read FreeBSD-STABLE. :-) Now I know I have to do some extra work the next time I upgrade a -STABLE system. If I get bitten it's *my* fault. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org http://www.lambertfam.org/~lambert/resume.html 3 years Sr. SysAdmin experience with FreeBSD in small & medium size ISPs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020328032452.GB13004>