Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:45:32 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: umount -f Message-ID: <19990211174532.A46364@matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <199902111324.IAA25866@kot.ne.mediaone.net>; from Mikhail Teterin on Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 08:24:52AM -0500 References: <19990211144449.A45575@matti.ee> <199902111324.IAA25866@kot.ne.mediaone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 08:24:52AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> wrote: > =Do you have "hard" mount or "soft" mount? I have seen such behavior > =for "hard" mounts. > > Soft. But it should not matter, should it? I don't know, I'm not a expert to say for sure. Only know that about two months ago I tried to soft mount some exports from our Solaris 2.5.1 box and after that I was able to forcibly umount them. That's all I can say, I haven't used any NFS mounts since. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990211174532.A46364>