Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 03:14:32 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel config file according to config(5): inconsistent ? Message-ID: <20101227022144.O30408@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20101226151233.00001f7e@unknown> References: <20101226120033.CC15F1065773@hub.freebsd.org> <20101226235319.Y30408@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101226133539.000003c5@unknown> <20101227013810.T30408@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101226151233.00001f7e@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 01:50:45 +1100 (EST) > Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: > > > Probably should be easy, but from trying to parse that and lang.l I > > get the vague impression (at best) that Rob's original should have > > worked? > > > > Too much partying probably .. care to enlighten us? > > The NOOPTION token doesn't accept an Opt_list, just a Save_Id - it's > just OPTIONS and MAKEOPTIONS that can have a list. Ah, indeed. So the config(5) nooption[s] entry is plain wrong, or at least 'ahead of the code' :) and whitespace is ignored anyway. Interesting parser; thanks for the introductory crash course! cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101227022144.O30408>