Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:42:38 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Johan Karlsson <johan@freebsd.org> Cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where do %j/uintmax_t stand in terms of standards? [WAS: Re: WARNS cleanup for ipfw Message-ID: <20040306174237.GA28880@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20040306173219.GB64109@numeri.campus.luth.se> References: <20040306111922.GA64109@numeri.campus.luth.se> <20040306082625.B34490@xorpc.icir.org> <20040306173219.GB64109@numeri.campus.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:32:19PM +0100, Johan Karlsson wrote: > [lets move this from ipfw@ to standars@ to get an answer] > > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 08:26 (-0800) +0000, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > Also, where do %j/uintmax_t stand in terms of standards ? > > certainly the gcc in 4.x does not like them... > > I have absolutly no idea. Can someone here at standards@ answer > this question? %j/uintmax_t are part of C99 (but not C89) so they are standard. However gcc 2.95 (which is what FreeBSD 4.x ships with) does not support C99 so it is not surprising if it complains. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040306174237.GA28880>