Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:19:58 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Commerical applications (was: Development and validation
Message-ID:  <199701222319.QAA22372@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199701220514.WAA23918@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Jan 21, 97 10:14:45 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Jordan wrote:
> > > I think you're working from a misperception.  The core team doesn't
> > > spend its time sitting around rubbing its collective hands together
> > > and going "Mooohahahaha!  POWER!" so it's not likely to consider this
> > > in terms of power loss so much as it is in terms of how much workload
> > > is generated.

[ ... ]

Nate writes:
> Umm, I think you are working from a misperception.  The core team
> doesn't have anything to do with determining the 'workload' of FreeBSD.

Jordan is talking in terms of workload generated.  If you don't like
the assumptive framework, talk to Jorden.  I'm just responding in the
framework that has been established.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701222319.QAA22372>