Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Dec 1997 17:49:48 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   The 'Stable' status of freeBSD-stable
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.971205173721.16057A-100000@current1.whistle.com>

index | next in thread | raw e-mail


So today I got bitten by another API change in the 2.2 stream.
old machines (2.2.1 vintage) can't run cpio from new
images..

the now binaries use 'lchown(2)'
We really need to make a clear policy about this..
I was under the impression (and so was Mike Smith)
that the 2.2 series was supposed to have a STABLE interface!

being able to add a binary from 2.2.5 to a 2.2.1 machine SHOULD work..

ok, so I've built a new kernel for that machine and hopefully that will be
the end of it, but even though people have complained about thigs I
have added to -stable, I've always been careful that they were completely
transparrent.


just a grumble....

(overrall I'm quite pleased with the stability, and we have LOTS of
FreeBSD machines out there, all running 2.2.x kernels)

julian





help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971205173721.16057A-100000>