Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:12:10 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, Christoph Kukulies <kuku@physik.rwth-aachen.de>, current@FreeBSD.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: /lib symlinks problem? Message-ID: <20030902061210.GZ695@roark.gnf.org> In-Reply-To: <20030901051049.GB91933@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200308291454.h7TEsb913915@accms33.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030829172348.1aa0b5d4.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030829161907.GA89129@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20030830135427.0cea7fdb.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030830185653.GA10674@sunbay.com> <20030831140742.3bd1b597.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030831145224.GC28845@sunbay.com> <20030901051049.GB91933@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 10:10:49PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > I might be missing an obvious, but I just don't see a reason
> > > > why we should use relative linking here: we should just link
> > > > to where we really install. With the attached patch, I get:
> ...
> > +.if ${LIBDIR} != ${SHLIBDIR}
> > + ln -fs ${SHLIBDIR}/${SHLIB_NAME} ${DESTDIR}${LIBDIR}/${SHLIB_LINK}
>
> Why are we making *any* symlinks here??
It was before we corrected ld(1) to look in /lib. I'm happy with
removing them now that it has been corrected.
-gordon
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/VDS6Ru2t9DV9ZfsRAq81AJ9xzOS7nebkAUPhCWSESQbxHcahcgCeLG7y
vEd6Zr3LB8CIS0FBXgtbStM=
=1pXy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030902061210.GZ695>