Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:26:56 +0000 From: "Luiz Gustavo S. Costa" <luizgustavo@mundounix.com.br> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: rdr + reply-to, some solution ? Message-ID: <AANLkTinTZ84cngLQxfPrWTQr1IGqekmZerP7y3wDl3t8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQDT9IOfmNxAJSzGRj3TCmtKNso8hqLXFQebLr@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimQDT9IOfmNxAJSzGRj3TCmtKNso8hqLXFQebLr@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all. I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty solution. Is there any alternative? Below is an example of what I'm talking about. # Nat section rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> 192.168.1.100 # Rules section pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 the "reply-to" not working with rdr rule. Thanks -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinTZ84cngLQxfPrWTQr1IGqekmZerP7y3wDl3t8>