Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:53:39 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: kientzle@acm.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/nologin Makefile nologin.c Message-ID: <403A3E23.3010101@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <20040223132445.GD77434@over-yonder.net> References: <200402221003.i1MA3PW0024791@repoman.freebsd.org> <403944D8.6050107@kientzle.com> <20040223025647.GA43467@VARK.homeunix.com> <40397824.3080607@kientzle.com> <20040223052110.GA58255@VARK.homeunix.com> <40399858.8060506@kientzle.com> <20040223132445.GD77434@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:06:16PM -0800 I heard the voice of > Tim Kientzle, and lo! it spake thus: > >>Is there any reason why "login -p" should be permitted >>if the user's shell is not listed in /etc/shells ? > > What about people who put nologin in shells so the users can FTP > files, but not login to the system? > If users aren't logging into the system, they have no need to use the "-p" option to the login program. Or have I missed your point? Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?403A3E23.3010101>