Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:56:52 -0700 From: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <20020711045652.GA4478@gnuppy.monkey.org> In-Reply-To: <15661.3652.734594.522357@emerger.yogotech.com> References: <20020710234814.GE2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711035137.GA4210@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15661.575.854309.132871@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711044606.GA4375@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15661.3652.734594.522357@emerger.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:49:08PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > Julian (the person we get to blame for these bugs) can't determine why > sometimes it works and other times it doesn't, so I'm suprised you are > so confident in your ability to differentiate between kernel 'signal' > bugs and JVM bugs. Maybe I'm taking on too much at this time with kernel signals (fix julian's problems), userspace signals and HotSpot. I am getting wierd pauses and I'm curious if they're KSE related. If that's the case, then you'll see a backport effort done by me. > Dan *owns* libc_r. If it's done to libc_r, he's the man to commit the > changes after reviewing them. > > If you want the changes backported, then Dan is the man to do it. If > you want it done sooner, let him know what needs to be done, (providing > patches, pointers, etc..) True, but the review process doesn't excluded the backport effort itself. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020711045652.GA4478>