Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:50:14 -0500 From: "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades) Message-ID: <20040608115014.3bbba804.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <20040608144433.D31793@unsane.co.uk> <40C5DBD1.5010607@circlesquared.com> <16581.57971.324955.793717@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:36:47 -0400 Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote: > Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> wrote: > > > Robert Huff wrote: > > > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > > > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees > > >> many commits that are likely to be problematic. > > >> > > > In general, no. > > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > > > > QED > > I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... > > What's "QED"? > > -- > Bill Moran If I recall correctly, it's Latin: "quod erat demonstrandum", meaning "as it has been demonstrated". Andrew Gould
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608115014.3bbba804.algould>