Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 09:35:56 +0900 From: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@bsdclub.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@bsdclub.org>, CHOI Junho <cjh@kr.FreeBSD.ORG>, i18n@FreeBSD.ORG, audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2CFR: locale names renaming Message-ID: <200106030035.f530Zu247879@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> References: <20010602040851.A34526@nagual.pp.ru> <86ofs7thvy.fsf@gradius.wdb.co.kr> <20010602143139.A43237@nagual.pp.ru> <200106021345.f52DjJ218044@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> <20010603002153.A48861@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> wrote:
> > So, we have to take enough time for transition period.
>
> Transition period means just delay whole thing until transition period
> end. After the end the same thing happens like without transition period,
> because people don't touch their setups when they works, so you can
> consider that transition period ends now.
If so, why both ru_SU.* and ru_RU.* co-exist in 4-stable?
We took a long time for transition from ru_SU to ru_RU.
3-stable branch (all 3.*-RELEASE) : ru_RU.* only
4-stable branch (all 4.*-RELEASE) : ru_RU.* and ru_SU.*
5-current branch (5.*-RELEASE ?) : ru_SU.* only
I think immediate transition (even in -current) is a bad idea.
I propose the following plan.
5-current (5-stable after 5.0-RELEASE) branch : both old and new locale
future 6-currnt branch : only new locale
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motoyuki Konno motoyuki@bsdclub.org (Home)
motoyuki@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Project)
http://www.freebsd.org/~motoyuki/ (WWW)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106030035.f530Zu247879>