Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:52:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Brian Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c src/sys/i386/isa clock.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990624105121.2735H-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <19990624130306.G13759@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > Actually, old consensus was to use just the account name if the > person(s) that did the submit had an account on freefall, so green is > following the consensus. Agreed. > However, given the spread of (necessary) account deletion, account > renaming and .nofinger files, I'm starting to wonder if we should > either request that people use full e-mail addresses, and/or keep a > web-page with all past and present @FreeBSD.org addresses mapped to > person (and possibly alternative e-mail address for the "past" > entries). > > What do the people think? Perhaps accounts should be 'retired' as opposed to deleted, giving the outgoing committer / account-holder the option to mail root@FreeBSD.org leaving a forwarding address(and changes). - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990624105121.2735H-100000>