Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 01:41:48 +0100 From: Bernhard Valenti <bernhard.valenti@gmx.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hmm..passwords. Message-ID: <20001122014148.A3437@cipher.home.at> In-Reply-To: <200011211823.SAA40356@ns.a1.org.uk>; from bap@a1.org.uk on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 06:23:51PM %2B0000 References: <20001121085551.A3534@citusc17.usc.edu> <200011211823.SAA40356@ns.a1.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 06:23:51PM +0000, Bap wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:49:33AM -0500, Sean O'Connell wrote: > > UPDATING is for hoops to jump through in getting your system up to > > date - I don't know that it's the right place for it. > If login.conf was changed to reflect the change in default, then most people > would pick this up in a meregemaster, or diff. > So it should be in either UPDATING or login.conf(?). having a default in /etc/login.conf would really be the best idea i think. as almost everyone runs mergemaster after a update, people will notice something has changed. adding it to UPDATING would have been appropriate back when the change took place though(imo). kris, you mention that we dont need to bother with libraries and symlinks anymore.. can that be translated to: "NODESCRYPTLINKS=true" is obsolete now(its still in /etc/defaults/make.conf) ? regards, bernhard valenti To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001122014148.A3437>