Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 15:53:44 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, terry@lambert.org, jdp@polstra.com, nate@sneezy.sri.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GAS question Message-ID: <199603172253.PAA20122@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199603171147.WAA19417@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Mar 17, 96 10:17:06 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> For crying out loud, wasn't it you, Terry, that was complaining about > not having an environment where you could click on a compiler error > and jump to the offending line of source? Emacs has been doing that > for as long as it's known what a mouse _is_. Now I need to complain that it's emacs... > No, the tools aren't perfect. Yes, 'good enough' tools _do_ exist. > > I don't swallow the inverse-NIH, sorry. I personally *really* like "BattleMap", an IDE (Interactive Developement Environment). It doesn't run on FreeBSD, unfortunately. > (Rant off. I just saw "Judge Dredd", and I didn't like it either. 8) Wish he'd taken the role seriously, like in "Demolition Man"... 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603172253.PAA20122>