Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:23:47 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion Message-ID: <xzp659kkkt8.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040622115532.W5744@mp2.macomnet.net> (Maxim Konovalov's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:15:21 %2B0400 (MSD)") References: <40D754D5.1070805@freebsd.org> <20040622115532.W5744@mp2.macomnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes: > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape. You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2. > Is it really worth to commit that > mostly cleanup code before say 6-CURRENT with a chance to > destabilizate -CURRENT a bit more? It is not simply cleanup, it is very important and long-expected cleanup. Delaying it until after the branch will only make matters worse, by accelerating code drift between HEAD and 5-STABLE. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp659kkkt8.fsf>